JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 13, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Luis Francisco Perez Nuñez Vs. Coomeva, Iss Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Cuarto Del Circuito Judicial Administrativo De Bucaramanga Y El Juzgado Tercero Penal Municipal Con Funciones De Control De Garantias De Bucaramanga. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Cuarto Del Circuito Judicial Administrativo De Bucaramanga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Varias autoridades de diferente nivel
  • Competencia de juez del circuito
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
  • Competencia de superior jerárquico común
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para dirimir conflictos de competencia
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • No corresponde a quienes la ejercen determinar a priori contra quienes se dirige la acción de tutela
4 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. del Circuito Judicial Administrativo de Bucaramanga, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  3. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese al Juzgado
  4. Tercero. Penal Municipal con Funciones de Control de Garantias, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Santander y a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura lo aqui resuelto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.